Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

Stan Barber sob at academ.com
Sat Mar 20 19:34:20 UTC 2021


+1 from the peanut gallery

On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:30 PM Allen Kitchen <
allenmckinleykitchen at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:07 PM Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>
>> i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic.
>> in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in
>> it being the de facto global anything-ops list.  perhaps we do not
>> need to fix that.
>>
>> randy
>>
>>
>> +1 (or as much more as I can be credited for)
>
> ..Allen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210320/7fa6d518/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list