Perhaps it's not time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

Sat Mar 20 19:02:48 UTC 2021

I agree.
mh

20 mars 2021 19:57 "John Levine" <johnl at iecc.com> a écrit:

> It appears that Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> said:
> 
>> -=-=-=-=-=-
>> 
>> That seems like a reasonable proposal. NANOG-OffTopic, NANOG-Discuss, NANOG-BizDev, NANOG-xyz,
>> something (more more than one something).
> 
> Having been around this barn a few times, I can promise you that won't work, because threads
> will never stay on the appropriate list.
> 
> Mailman topics might work better but I've never seen a list that used them successfully.
> 
> For once, I'm with Randy. The volume from NANOG at its chattiest is not huge, and if you
> have trouble keeping up with it, perhaps you could consider a better mail program.
> 
> R's,
> John