Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Sat Mar 20 18:06:10 UTC 2021
i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic.
in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in
it being the de facto global anything-ops list. perhaps we do not
need to fix that.
randy
---
randy at psg.com
`gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd randy at psg.com`
signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery
More information about the NANOG
mailing list