Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

Sat Mar 20 14:46:43 UTC 2021

On 3/20/21 15:13, Niels Bakker wrote:

>
> The volume isn't the point, the S:N ratio is. Mails like this thread's 
> starter are off-topic and reduce the value of the list to its 
> subscribers. Your reasoning is easy, common and fallacious.

Plenty of volume being created for something - I presume - most folk on 
this list won't be able to respond to with protein anyway.

Not seeing the issue, really. As most have done, if you can provide 
protein, respond. If you can't ignore.

Next thread.

Mark.