DOD prefixes and AS8003 / GRSCORP

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Mon Mar 15 19:21:25 UTC 2021


According to the timeline posted to this list (by you, Siyuan), Globl Resource Systems, LLC was registered in Delaware on September 8, 2020.
Your timeline also shows the resources being issued to GRS by ARIN on September 11, september 14, 2020
It looks to me like they subsequently registered the corporation in Florida and moved the company address there.

I don’t see anything suspicious here based on your own statements, so I’m a bit confused what you are on about.

Owen

> On Mar 12, 2021, at 03:34 , Siyuan Miao <aveline at misaka.io> wrote:
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> My biggest concern is why the AS8003 was assigned to the company (GLOBAL RESOURCE SYSTEMS, LLC) even before its existence.
> 
> When we were requesting resources or transfers, ARIN always asked us to provide a Certificate of Good Standing and we had to pay the state to order it.
> 
> However, it appears that a Certificate of Good Standing is not required or ARIN didn't validate it in this case. 
> 
> Regards,
> Siyuan
> 
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 7:17 PM John Curran <jcurran at arin.net <mailto:jcurran at arin.net>> wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2021, at 7:56 AM, Siyuan Miao <aveline at misaka.io <mailto:aveline at misaka.io>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Folks,
>> 
>> Just noticed that almost all DOD prefixes (7.0.0.0/8,11.0.0.0/8,22.0.0.0/8 <http://7.0.0.0/8,11.0.0.0/8,22.0.0.0/8> and bunch of /22s)  are now announced under AS8003 (GRSCORP) which was just formed a few months ago.
>> 
>> It looks so suspicious. Does anyone know if it's authorized?
> 
> Siyuan - 
> 
> If you have concerns, you can confirm whether these IP address blocks are being routed as intended by verification with their listed technical contacts - e.g. https://search.arin.net/rdap/?query=22.0.0.0 <https://search.arin.net/rdap/?query=22.0.0.0>  
> 
> As I noted on this list several weeks back - "lack of routing history is not at all a reliable indicator of the potential for valid routing of a given IPv4 block in the future, so best practice suggest that allocated address space should not be blocked by others without specific cause. Doing otherwise opens one up to unexpected surprises when issued space suddenly becomes more active in routing and is yet is inexplicably unreachable for some destinations."
> 
> Thanks!
> /John
> 
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> American Registry for Internet Numbers
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210315/7d17202d/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list