Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?

Mon Mar 8 17:33:01 UTC 2021

Yeah, I know a couple of people who have thrown massive peeringdb operations up just to make them look big but their routing table analysis looks nothing like what they say they have.

James W. Breeden

Managing Partner

[cid:3c34773f-9c3e-42cf-87ba-144ee1fa163f]

Arenal Group: Arenal Consulting Group | Acilis Telecom | Pines Media | Atheral | BlueNinja

PO Box 1063 | Smithville, TX 78957

Email: james at arenalgroup.co<mailto:james at arenalgroup.co> | office 512.360.0000 | cell 512.304.0745 | www.arenalgroup.co<http://www.arenalgroup.co/>
Executive Assistant: Chelsea Nichols: chelsea at arenalgroup.co | 737.302.8742

________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+james=arenalgroup.co at nanog.org> on behalf of Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2021 6:14 PM
To: nanog at nanog.org list <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Is there an established method for reporting/getting removed a company with 100% false peeringdb entries?

First, take a look at this:

https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894

Now look at these (or use your own BGP table analysis tools):

https://bgp.he.net/AS18894

https://stat.ripe.net/18894

The claimed prefixes announced, traffic levels and POPs appear to have no correlation with reality in global v4/v6 BGP tables.

It is also noteworthy that I have inquired with a number of persons I know who are active in network engineering in NYC, and nobody has ever encountered this company.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210308/61d89504/attachment.html>