Beta Starlink with a slight tree obstruction vs degraded DOCSIS3 last mile

Eric Kuhnke eric.kuhnke at gmail.com
Wed Jun 30 01:01:50 UTC 2021


The local cable last mile operator broke something locally, or something
degraded (water ingress, bad connectors, who knows) and can't get their act
together sufficiently to dispatch a field tech and fix it.

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021, 11:03 AM Josh Luthman <josh at imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:

> What happened on June 20/21?  Looks like someone broke something on your
> cable link or perhaps an ICMP rate limiting was introduced.
>
> Josh Luthman
> 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:45 AM Matt Hoppes <
> mattlists at rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
>
>> I don't know how you can be embarrassed when you have a pretty solid
>> 30ms ping constantly, and Starlink has jitter all over the place and
>> spikes as high as 280ms.
>>
>> I'll take the DOCSIS3 system....
>>
>> On 6/25/21 8:49 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>> > I thought I would post an interesting comparison between a degraded
>> > DOCSIS3 link, of a carrier that shall remain nameless to avoid
>> > embarrassing anybody, and a starlink CPE with a slight 1/12th tree
>> > obstruction in a portion of its view.
>> >
>> > First two screenshots are the docsis3, to its gateway and to a very
>> > reliable hosted asterisk system in Seattle.
>> >
>> > Second two screenshots are starlink, also to its gateway and to the
>> same
>> > destination.
>> >
>> > https://imgur.com/a/OQ5wyDr
>> >
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210629/de0c9efe/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list