Beta Starlink with a slight tree obstruction vs degraded DOCSIS3 last mile

Wed Jun 30 01:00:50 UTC 2021

I'd much rather have 0.11 to 0.25% average packet loss over a 3 to 24 hour
period than 2-3%.

The starlink experience is overall superior at present from a subjective
user point of view.

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021, 10:45 AM Matt Hoppes <
mattlists at rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:

> I don't know how you can be embarrassed when you have a pretty solid
> 30ms ping constantly, and Starlink has jitter all over the place and
> spikes as high as 280ms.
>
> I'll take the DOCSIS3 system....
>
> On 6/25/21 8:49 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> > I thought I would post an interesting comparison between a degraded
> > DOCSIS3 link, of a carrier that shall remain nameless to avoid
> > embarrassing anybody, and a starlink CPE with a slight 1/12th tree
> > obstruction in a portion of its view.
> >
> > First two screenshots are the docsis3, to its gateway and to a very
> > reliable hosted asterisk system in Seattle.
> >
> > Second two screenshots are starlink, also to its gateway and to the same
> > destination.
> >
> > https://imgur.com/a/OQ5wyDr
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210629/4b9a117a/attachment.html>