Muni broadband sucks (was: New minimum speed for US broadband connections)

Fri Jun 4 14:20:33 UTC 2021

All I'm going to say is at $5/foot for fiber, even if it's 864 count, you
are royally overpaying for material!

Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 3:42 AM Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 2:53 AM Masataka Ohta <
> mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
>
>> Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>>
>> > Sorry but that claim is completely wrong. Cabling cost scales linearly
>> with
>> > the number of cores.
>>
>
> My apology to Masataka Ohta for my too strong wording by calling you
> wrong. The moderators put me in place. I wanted to say I disagree with the
> claim.
>
>
>> Most of cabling cost is cost to lay cables. Backhoe costs.
>> Space factor of a fiber cable is negligible if you put a
>> cable into utility tunnels which is wide, especially when
>> tunnels were used for copper cables of POTS.
>>
>
> It is true that trenching costs are higher than the cables themselves. But
> that does not mean the cables are cheap and that it is an
> insignificant cost. Cables + duct is about 20% of our cost to lay down the
> network. Not having huts with active equipment spread all around is also a
> huge cost saving that can not be ignored.
>
>  > The cost of 144 is not
>>  > double that of 72.  288 is not double the cost of 144.
>>
>> Yup. When PON was first conceived several tens of years ago, core
>> cost a lot. But, today...
>>
>
> I should point out that I probably buy more cable than most. The exact
> pricing is of course not public, but lets say a core cost somewhere between
> 1 to 2 USD cents per meter. Then you simply multiply up to get an
> approximate price of the cable. Holds true for cables with more than about
> 12 cores. This is because with larger cables the cost of the cores dominate
> the price of the cable. When you buy as much as we do, you do not really
> get a huge rebate for buying more cores in a single cable - we already buy
> insane amounts of core - it is just distributed in more cables.
>
> The moderator is right in that we do not seem to progress much here in
> this discussion. So lets agree to disagree. But let me get this closing
> comment in anyway... the guy that actually builds PON networks says he does
> so, because it is significantly cheaper. We have no other motivations as
> our network is not open to third parties in any case. Our motivation is to
> stay profitable.
>
> Regards,
>
> Baldur
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210604/7d1033b9/attachment.html>