Muni broadband sucks (was: New minimum speed for US broadband connections)
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Thu Jun 3 15:59:44 UTC 2021
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> As cabling cost is mostly independent of the number of cores in a cable,
> as long as enough number of cores for single star are provided, which
> means core cost is mostly cabling cost divided by number of subscribers,
> single star does not cost so much.
>
> Then, PON, needing large closures for splitters and lengthy drop
> cables from the closures, costs a lot cancelling small cost of
> using dedicated cores of single star.
>
> On the other hand, if PON is assumed and the number of cores in a
> cable is small, core cost for single star will be large and only
> one PON operator with the largest share (shortest drop cable from
> closures to, e.g. 8 customers) can survive, resulting in monopoly.
My experience is that people can prove either active-e or pon is the
cheapest by changing the in-parameters of the calculation. There are valid
concerns/advantages with both and there is no one-size-fits-all.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
More information about the NANOG
mailing list