New minimum speed for US broadband connections

Tue Jun 1 18:27:30 UTC 2021

This short term mindset is part of the problem. I’ve seen projects around me using CAF funds that push DSLAMs further into the network to get users up to 100mbps, but they are already at their ceiling as soon as they are installed. I admire providers who invest beyond the short term into something that is future proof. 100mbps shouldn’t be the goal, it should be the baseline. It’s particularly troubling knowing how much federal tax money is subsidizing these installs that have no headroom on day 1. In my case, my neighbors get 25/1.5 on ADSL that loses sync half the time when it rains, partially in credit to the 30+ year old copper plant it runs on. Putting a DSLAM within 3000ft only fixes a small part of the problem.

Starlink won’t have the capacity to fix all rural broadband, but It will be interesting to see whether it applies pressure to the incumbents, or if it stunts capital investment in less dense areas as users flee the decrepit service available.

I am at least grateful that Auction 904 weighted and prioritized awards based on speeds delivered.

Chris

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+chris.adams=ung.edu at nanog.org> On Behalf Of james.cutler at consultant.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 2:14 PM
To: Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net>
Cc: nanog list <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the University of North Georgia. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you suspect this message is fraudulent, please forward to spam at ung.edu<mailto:spam at ung.edu?subject=%5BSPAM%20REPORT%5D> or contact the IT Service Desk at 706-864-1922.
On Jun 1, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net<mailto:nanog at ics-il.net>> wrote:

"Why is 100/100 seen as problematic to the industry players?"

In rural settings, it's low density, so you're spending a bunch of money with a low probability of getting any return. Also, a low probability that the customer cares.

Of course, this is because the “industry” is driven short term profits and can not vision the eventual dispersion of remote workers begun in earnest about a year and which could result in longer term return on investment.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210601/5db2cb0f/attachment.html>