Nice work Ron

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Sun Jan 24 19:33:59 UTC 2021


Again, I'm not saying is the best way, is what the community *decided* before I added a clarification. The 50% was not a change, just to make it explicit, what was the actual interpretation.

If you don't like it, stop complaining, and send a policy proposal, I could even support it, but I'm not convinced it will reach consensus.

 

El 24/1/21 15:34, "NANOG en nombre de Masataka Ohta" <nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel.es at nanog.org en nombre de mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> escribió:

    JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:

    > I fully understand what you mean, however, I don’t think this is a
    > problem even if all the RIRs ask for “%50 or even 100%” of usage in
    > the region.

    So, you don't know how most, if not all, ISPs are operating
    their network.

     > That will make your life more complex, as you will need to obtain

    It makes ISP's operations a lot more complex and a lot less
    profitable to be ignored by almost all, if not all, ISPs.

    Your theory that ISPs could have behaved otherwise is not
    helpful in the real world of business and not practically
    acceptable by RIRs mostly consisting of ISPs.

    						Masataka Ohta



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.





More information about the NANOG mailing list