Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' Office is on NANOG?? Or, what is the policy about sharing email offlist?

Tue Jan 19 22:37:49 UTC 2021

Sounds like someone has more time to talk/type about political dogma with
random strangers than the purpose of this mailing list.

- J

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:58 AM J. Hellenthal <jhellenthal at dataix.net>
wrote:

> Yeah he did the same dolt act to me to. Just a really bored dolt looking
> for nonsense with a crush on AOC.
>
> --
>  J. Hellenthal
>
> The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says
> a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>
> On Jan 19, 2021, at 00:40, Javier J <javier at advancedmachines.us> wrote:
>
> 
> you too, why are you emailing me?
>
> I didn't ask anyone to contact me off list.
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 8:53 PM Sam Silvester <sam.silvester at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Archives are browsable by anybody. How do you expect to keep political
>> types out of the discussion?
>>
>> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 11:36 am, Javier J <javier at advancedmachines.us>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I couldn't agree more.
>>> If I want to talk politics, I will go to other places. I use this
>>> mailing list to talk about things relevant to technology and operation of
>>> networks in North American and other places.
>>>
>>> - Javier
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:19 PM Mel Beckman <mel at beckman.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> javier,
>>>>
>>>> I concur. What we don’t need on Nanog is outside parties deciding to
>>>> “reign in” our discussions on political grounds!
>>>>
>>>>  -mel beckman
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 18, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Javier J <javier at advancedmachines.us>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> I agree 100%.
>>>>
>>>> I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine.  What I
>>>> don't appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address
>>>> list because of someone's behavior.
>>>>
>>>> - Javier
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be
>>>>> private to list members" and "don't forward the list to
>>>>> autoresponders."
>>>>> The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it,
>>>>> should result in their removal from the list, at least until they
>>>>> explain
>>>>> what caused them to do that and have undone it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Paul Timmins wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the
>>>>> policy.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
>>>>> >>  Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what
>>>>> is the
>>>>> >>  policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is "no
>>>>> sharing
>>>>> >>  offlist" and then someone does, there are consequences for that
>>>>> someone.
>>>>> >>  Anne
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>  --
>>>>> >>  Anne P. Mitchell,  Attorney at Law
>>>>> >>  Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School
>>>>> >>  Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal
>>>>> anti-spam law)
>>>>> >>  Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
>>>>> >>  Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
>>>>> >>  Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>   Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
>>>>>   StackPath, Sr. Neteng       |  therefore you are
>>>>> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
>>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210119/85cd7af9/attachment.html>