Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' Office is on NANOG?? Or, what is the policy about sharing email offlist?

Javier J javier at advancedmachines.us
Tue Jan 19 06:35:19 UTC 2021


you too, why are you emailing me?

I didn't ask anyone to contact me off list.

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 8:53 PM Sam Silvester <sam.silvester at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Archives are browsable by anybody. How do you expect to keep political
> types out of the discussion?
>
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 11:36 am, Javier J <javier at advancedmachines.us>
> wrote:
>
>> I couldn't agree more.
>> If I want to talk politics, I will go to other places. I use this mailing
>> list to talk about things relevant to technology and operation of networks
>> in North American and other places.
>>
>> - Javier
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:19 PM Mel Beckman <mel at beckman.org> wrote:
>>
>>> javier,
>>>
>>> I concur. What we don’t need on Nanog is outside parties deciding to
>>> “reign in” our discussions on political grounds!
>>>
>>>  -mel beckman
>>>
>>> On Jan 18, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Javier J <javier at advancedmachines.us>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>> I agree 100%.
>>>
>>> I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine.  What I
>>> don't appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address
>>> list because of someone's behavior.
>>>
>>> - Javier
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be
>>>> private to list members" and "don't forward the list to autoresponders."
>>>> The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it,
>>>> should result in their removal from the list, at least until they
>>>> explain
>>>> what caused them to do that and have undone it.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Paul Timmins wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the policy.
>>>> >
>>>> > https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/
>>>> >
>>>> > On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
>>>> >>  Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what
>>>> is the
>>>> >>  policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is "no sharing
>>>> >>  offlist" and then someone does, there are consequences for that
>>>> someone.
>>>> >>  Anne
>>>> >>
>>>> >>  --
>>>> >>  Anne P. Mitchell,  Attorney at Law
>>>> >>  Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School
>>>> >>  Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal
>>>> anti-spam law)
>>>> >>  Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
>>>> >>  Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
>>>> >>  Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>   Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
>>>>   StackPath, Sr. Neteng       |  therefore you are
>>>> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210119/8d4b7991/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list