Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' Office is on NANOG?? Or, what is the policy about sharing email offlist?

Tue Jan 19 06:34:33 UTC 2021

Why are you emailing me?

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:54 PM Jeff P <jeffp at jeffp.us> wrote:

> SEE!?!
>
> With no evidence yet publicly acknowledged as to who added the AOC email
> to the list now they are just accusing some random "A woman!"
>
> Words (The Pen) are mightier than any brute force (The Sword).
>
> And you did it without thought, just piled on. It came as natural to you
> as putting on your shoes in the morning.
>
> JeffP
> jeffp at jeffp.us
>
>
>
> *Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.*
>
> NOTICE:
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> Use or dissemination by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail to correct our records.
> Please then delete the original message (including any attachments) in its
> entirety, including any backup processes that your system may perform.
> Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
> those of the author. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure
> or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender,
> therefore, does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the
> contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Lorell Hathcock <lorell at hathcock.org>
> Date: Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' Office is on NANOG?? Or, what is
> the policy about sharing email offlist?
> To: Javier J <javier at advancedmachines.us>
> Cc: nanog <nanog at nanog.org>
>
>
> A-woman!
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Lorell Hathcock
>
> On Jan 18, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Javier J <javier at advancedmachines.us> wrote:
>
> 
> I agree 100%.
>
> I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine.  What I don't
> appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address list
> because of someone's behavior.
>
> - Javier
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org> wrote:
>
>> There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be
>> private to list members" and "don't forward the list to autoresponders."
>> The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it,
>> should result in their removal from the list, at least until they explain
>> what caused them to do that and have undone it.
>>
>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Paul Timmins wrote:
>>
>> > The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the policy.
>> >
>> > https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/
>> >
>> > On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
>> >>  Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what is
>> the
>> >>  policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is "no sharing
>> >>  offlist" and then someone does, there are consequences for that
>> someone.
>> >>  Anne
>> >>
>> >>  --
>> >>  Anne P. Mitchell,  Attorney at Law
>> >>  Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School
>> >>  Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam
>> law)
>> >>  Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
>> >>  Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
>> >>  Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>   Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
>>   StackPath, Sr. Neteng       |  therefore you are
>> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210119/7ca5b653/attachment.html>