Parler

Sun Jan 10 22:32:11 UTC 2021

This is a list for pushing bits.  The fact that many/most of us have other
businesses doesn't make this an appropriate forum for SIP issues (to use my
own work as an example).

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 4:52 PM <sronan at ronan-online.com> wrote:

> This is a list for Network Operators, AWS certainly operates networks.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 4:27 PM, K. Scott Helms <kscott.helms at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> 
> No,
>
> It really does not.  Section 230 only applies to publishers, and not to
> network providers.  If this were a cloud hosting provider list then you'd
> be correct, but as a network provider's list it does not belong here.
>
>
> Scott Helms
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 3:21 PM Lady Benjamin PD Cannon <ben at 6by7.net>
> wrote:
>
>> As network operations and compute/cloud/hosting operations continue to
>> coalesce, I very much disagree with you.  Section 230 is absolutely
>> relevant, this discussion is timely and relevant, and it directly affects
>> me as both a telecom and cloud compute/services provider.
>>
>>
>> —L.B.
>>
>> Lady Benjamin PD Cannon, ASCE
>> 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC
>> CEO
>> ben at 6by7.net
>> "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in
>> the world.”
>> FCC License KJ6FJJ
>>
>> <Speedtest9118.png>
>> <Ben LIC.png>
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 12:13 PM, K. Scott Helms <kscott.helms at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> It's not, and frankly it's disappointing to see people pushing an agenda
>> here.
>>
>>
>> Scott Helms
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 9:37 AM <sronan at ronan-online.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> NANOG is a group of Operators, discussion does not have to be about
>> networking. I have already explained how this represents a significant
>> issue for Network Operators.
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:09 AM, Mike Bolitho <mikebolitho at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> It has nothing to do with networking. Their decision was necessarily
>> political. If you can specifically bring up an issue, beyond speculative,
>> on how their new chosen CDN is somehow now causing congestion or routing
>> issues on the public internet, then great. But as of now, that isn't even a
>> thing. It's just best to leave it alone because it will devolve into chaos.
>>
>> - Mike Bolitho
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 6:54 AM <sronan at ronan-online.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Why? This is extremely relevant to network operators and is not political
>> at all.
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Mike Bolitho <mikebolitho at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> Can we please not go down this rabbit hole on here? List admins?
>>
>> - Mike Bolitho
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 1:26 AM William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Anybody looking for a new customer opportunity? It seems Parler is in
>> search of a new service provider. Vendors need only provide all the
>> proprietary AWS APIs that Parler depends upon to function.
>>
>>
>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/09/amazon-parler-suspension/
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bill HErrin
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210110/3bde4f76/attachment.html>