Parler

Sun Jan 10 14:08:12 UTC 2021

Yes, it seems subsection (c)(2)(b) gives them cover, perhaps it’s time that this is revised, less the Internet content become moderated by a small group of private platform owners.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Daniel Jurado <jurado98 at mail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Government made it political.
> Parler is free conservative speech that the MSM doesn't control.
> CNN stated that it was a threat to democracy because they didn't have control over what was posted like Twitter or Facebook.
> So at this point it is 100% political.
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my Android phone with mail.com Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>> On 1/10/21, 8:57 AM sronan at ronan-online.com wrote:
>> Why? This is extremely relevant to network operators and is not political at all. 
>> 
>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Mike Bolitho <mikebolitho at gmail.com> wrote: 
>> 
>> 
>> Can we please not go down this rabbit hole on here? List admins? 
>> 
>> - Mike Bolitho
>> 
>>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 1:26 AM William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote: 
>>> Anybody looking for a new customer opportunity? It seems Parler is in 
>>> search of a new service provider. Vendors need only provide all the 
>>> proprietary AWS APIs that Parler depends upon to function. 
>>> 
>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/09/amazon-parler-suspension/
>>> 
>>> Regards, 
>>> Bill HErrin 
> 
> <Daniel Jurado.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210110/916c6052/attachment.html>