DoD IP Space
owen at delong.com
Fri Feb 12 09:06:21 UTC 2021
Eric, I’d argue that does fall within the definition of incompetence called out by Izaac.
I’m talking about how you run out of RFC-1918 space (if you choose to use it in the first place) without incompetence.
> On Feb 11, 2021, at 09:15 , Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke at gmail.com> wrote:
> You don't, you wastefully assign a /24 to every unique thing that you think needs an internal management IP block (even if there's 5 things that answer pings there), and decide it's too much work to renumber things. Easy for a big ISP that's also acquired many small/mid-sized ISPs to run out of v4 private IP space that way.
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 4:05 AM Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>> wrote:
> Please explain to me how you uniquely number 40M endpoints with RFC-1918 without running out of
> addresses and without creating partitioned networks.
> If you can’t, then I’m not the one making excuses.
> > On Feb 9, 2021, at 15:44 , Izaac <izaac at setec.org <mailto:izaac at setec.org>> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:36:57PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> >> it is definitely possible to run out of RFC-1918 space with scale and no incompetence.
> > No, it isn't. It's the year 2021. Stop making excuses.
> > --
> > . ___ ___ . . ___
> > . \ / |\ |\ \
> > . _\_ /__ |-\ |-\ \__
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NANOG