DoD IP Space

William Herrin bill at herrin.us
Thu Feb 11 17:53:56 UTC 2021


On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 6:13 AM Izaac <izaac at setec.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:38:00AM -0800, William Herrin wrote:
> > None whatsoever. You just have to be really big.
>
> Hi Beel,

That was unnecessary. Sorry I used an S instead of a Z.

> Thanks for backing me up with an example of an organization with
> competent network engineering.  Their ability to almost infinitely
> leverage the existing rfc1918 address space to serve an appreciable
> fraction of all Internet attached hosts is a real demonstration of the
> possible.

Except they don't. One of the reasons you can't put vms in multiple
regions into the same VPC is they don't have enough IP addresses to
uniquely address the backend hosts in every region. They end up with a
squirrelly VPC peering thing they relies on multiple gateway hosts to
overcome the address partitioning from overlapping RFC1918.

In other words, it proves the exact opposite of your assertion.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/


More information about the NANOG mailing list