Log4j mitigation

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Mon Dec 13 19:24:22 UTC 2021


The bigger problem seems to be the ever growing list of products you may be using which depend on it potentially without your knowledge.

Owen


> On Dec 11, 2021, at 03:41 , Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:
> 
> This is largely a patching exercise for people that use the software. If you use it, please patch. 
> 
> Sent via RFC1925 complaint device
> 
>> On Dec 10, 2021, at 10:59 PM, Andy Ringsmuth <andy at andyring.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The intricacies of Java are over my head, but I’ve been reading about this Log4j issue that sounds pretty bad.
>> 
>> What do we know about this? What, if anything, can a network operator do to help mitigate this? Or even an end user?
>> 
>> ----
>> Andy Ringsmuth
>> 5609 Harding Drive
>> Lincoln, NE 68521-5831
>> (402) 304-0083
>> andy at andyring.com



More information about the NANOG mailing list