Log4j mitigation
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Mon Dec 13 19:24:22 UTC 2021
The bigger problem seems to be the ever growing list of products you may be using which depend on it potentially without your knowledge.
Owen
> On Dec 11, 2021, at 03:41 , Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
> This is largely a patching exercise for people that use the software. If you use it, please patch.
>
> Sent via RFC1925 complaint device
>
>> On Dec 10, 2021, at 10:59 PM, Andy Ringsmuth <andy at andyring.com> wrote:
>>
>> The intricacies of Java are over my head, but I’ve been reading about this Log4j issue that sounds pretty bad.
>>
>> What do we know about this? What, if anything, can a network operator do to help mitigate this? Or even an end user?
>>
>> ----
>> Andy Ringsmuth
>> 5609 Harding Drive
>> Lincoln, NE 68521-5831
>> (402) 304-0083
>> andy at andyring.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list