Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006

Colin Legendre clegendre at coextro.com
Fri Dec 10 00:17:05 UTC 2021


Thanks for this.. turned off netflow export.. and it dropped our qfp load
from 44% to 18%.  ugh..

---
Colin Legendre



On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 4:22 AM Brian Turnbow via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
wrote:

>
>
> > On 11/26/2021 1:09 PM, Colin Legendre wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We have ...
> > >
> > > ASR1006  that has following cards...
> > > 1 x ESP40
> > > 1 x SIP40
> > > 4 x SPA-1x10GE-L-V2
> > > 1 x 6TGE
> > > 1 x RP2
> > >
> > > We've been having latency and packet loss during peak periods...
> > >
> > > We notice all is good until we reach 50% utilization on output of...
> > >
> > > 'show platform hardware qfp active datapath utilization summary'
> > >
> > > Literally ... 47% good... 48% good... 49% latency to next hop goes
> > > from 1ms to 15-20ms... 50% we see 1-2% packet-loss and 30-40ms
> > > latency... 53% we see 60-70ms latency and 8-10% packet loss.
> > >
> > > Is this expected... the ESP40 can only really push 20G and then starts
> > > to have performance issues?
> > >
>
> He had a similar issue about 4 years ago.
> We were showing packet loss and drops getting progressively worse and the
> router was falling over when reaching about 70% of usage.
> We could see the interface reliability go down and input errors due to
> overruns on the interfaces.
> Cisco blamed it on microburtst not being able to be handled under load.
>
>
> "We were able to replicate this scenario in our lab as well.
> QFP under high load generated input errors and overruns which in turn led
> to unicast failures/ drops/ latency.
> The issue is not consistent with QFP % utilization as sometimes with even
> 80%+ traffic, we  do not see the drops:"
>
> And recommended removing traffic or upgrading esp.
>
> One of our guys disabled nbar on the router and the problem disappeared.
> I would suggest taking a look at what features you are using and if you
> can try and disable them to see if it makes any impact.
> We then upgraded esps and all has been fine since.
>
> Brian
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20211209/09d63d1d/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list