private 5G networks?
Eliot Lear
lear at lear.ch
Sun Dec 5 08:42:46 UTC 2021
On 01.12.21 15:17, Tom Beecher wrote:
> While you are correct that it's just as illegal to intentionally
> interfere with the unlicensed wifi bands as it is with CBRS, the
> difference is that the FCC and regulatory bodies are much more likely
> to investigate and take action against intentional interference in
> these frequency ranges than they would be in the unlicensed wifi bands.
And there's a practical reason for that: establishing proof of
unauthorized use of a frequency is a heck of a lot easier than
intentional interference. All the former requires is triangulation of
the offending station. The latter requires that plus a finding of
intent. It CAN happen; but more often than not what is actually found is
a faulty piece of equipment that is emitting something and everything
else catching a bad harmonic. There was a famous case about this in
Wales in which an old television set took out a town.[1]
Eliot
https://www.openreach.com/news/second-hand-tv-wipes-out-broadband-for-entire-village/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 5051 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP public key
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20211205/e9ddbd8a/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 491 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20211205/e9ddbd8a/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list