questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

Sun Dec 5 18:42:31 UTC 2021

On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 7:43 AM Gary Buhrmaster
<gary.buhrmaster at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 2:23 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org> wrote:
> > The double billing (had it been present at the time) would have prevented me from signing the LRSA for my IPv4 resources.
>
> There were some community participants that suggested
> that having a formal relationship with the ARIN organization
> by signing the LRSA was good for the resource holders,
> and good for the overall commons.

I vaguely recall Owen being one of the most outspoken proponents.

> There were other
> members that suggested that signing the LRSA would be
> potentially disadvantageous at some future time.

I confess: I do have the urge to say I told him so.

> I do
> understand that some people may feel vindicated about
> not signing a LRSA,

Not yet. We're still at the stage where Darth Vader says, "I am
altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further."

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/