questions about ARIN ipv6 allocation

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Sun Dec 5 02:59:41 UTC 2021


I would be more than happy to consilolidate my ipv6 addresses under my lrsa, but ARIN will not allow it. 

Owen


> On Dec 4, 2021, at 17:43, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> 
>  Yes Owen, that is correct…
> 
> If an organization insists on maintaining multiple contractual relationships with ARIN (for whatever reason) then they will be billed for each relation separately - and that is indeed likely to be more than having a single consolidated agreement for all number resources.
> 
> Thanks,
> /John
> 
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> American Registry for Internet Numbers
> 
>>> On Dec 4, 2021, at 7:09 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>> On Dec 4, 2021, at 8:59 AM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Just for clarity - ARIN’s fee schedule is such that ISP customers (i.e. those with registration service plans) pay an annual services fee based on their higher category of IPv4 or IPv6 resources – i.e. those with IPv4 resources can obtain a corresponding size of IPv6 resources without any change in size category or increase in their annual fee. 
>>> 
>>> [Also worth noting - as of January 2022, all end-user customers are moving to the same registration services plan, and similarly those with just IPv4 number resources be able to obtain corresponding IPv6 resources without change to their annual fee.]
>> 
>> This, whether they want to or not… In many cases resulting in significant unwanted fee increases, especially if you have a mix of resources covered under RSA and LRSA due to ARIN’s accounting limitations that they are perversely disincentivized against fixing because it allows them to essentially double-bill.
>> 
>> Owen
>>> 
>> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20211204/1f289dd3/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list