"Tactical" /24 announcements
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Aug 17 10:58:19 UTC 2021
> Somewhat related, when JNPR implemented RTR the architecture was
> planned so that the RTR implementation itself isn't tightly coupled to
> RPKI validity. It was planned day1 that customers could have multiple
> RTR setups feeding prefixes and the NOS side could use these for other
> purposes too.
back in the day, the developing RP-rtr spec assumed multiple sources,
RPKI, IRR, ... there was also an open-ended operator defined Color
0 8 16 24 31
.-------------------------------------------.
| Protocol | PDU | |
| Version | Type | Color |
| 0 | 4 | |
+-------------------------------------------+
| |
| Length=20 |
| |
+-------------------------------------------+
| | Prefix | Max | Data |
| Flags | Length | Length | Source |
| | 0..32 | 0..32 | RPKI/IRR |
+-------------------------------------------+
| |
| IPv4 prefix |
| |
+-------------------------------------------+
| |
| Autonomous System Number |
| |
`-------------------------------------------'
until, at ietf maastricht (2010), the unfortunate actions of a bully who
wanted more and more caused us to walk away, give up, and fall back to
the simpler basic we have today.
0 8 16 24 31
.-------------------------------------------.
| Protocol | PDU | |
| Version | Type | reserved = zero |
| 0 | 4 | |
+-------------------------------------------+
| |
| Length=20 |
| |
+-------------------------------------------+
| | Prefix | Max | |
| Flags | Length | Length | zero |
| | 0..32 | 0..32 | |
+-------------------------------------------+
| |
| IPv4 Prefix |
| |
+-------------------------------------------+
| |
| Autonomous System Number |
| |
`-------------------------------------------'
randy
More information about the NANOG
mailing list