DoD IP Space

Sun Apr 25 13:13:19 UTC 2021

Sronan -

I’d suggest asking rather than making assertions when it comes to ARIN, as this will avoid propagating existing misinformation in the community.

Many US government agencies, including the US Department of Defense, have signed registration services agreements with ARIN.

From https://account.arin.net/public/member-list -

United States Department of Defense (DoD)

USDDD<https://search.arin.net/rdap?query=USDDD&searchFilter=entity>

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers

On 25 Apr 2021, at 8:54 AM, sronan at ronan-online.com<mailto:sronan at ronan-online.com> wrote:

Except these DoD blocks don’t fall under ARIM justification, as they predate ARIN. It is very likely that the DoD has never and will never sign any sort of ARIN agreement.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 25, 2021, at 3:40 AM, Mel Beckman <mel at beckman.org<mailto:mel at beckman.org>> wrote:

Mark,

ARIN rules require every IP space holder to publish accurate — and effective —  Admin, Tech, and Abuse POCs. The DOD hasn’t done this, as I pointed out, and as you can test for yourself. Your expectation that the DOD will “generally comply with all of the expected norms” is sorely naive, and already disproven.

As far as “why does anyone on the Internet need to publish to your arbitrary standards”, you seem to forget that in the U.S., the government is accountable to the People. Where a private company may not have to explain its purposes, the government most certainly does in the private sector. With these IP spaces being thrust into the civilian realm, yes, they owe the citizenry an explanation of their actions, just as they would if they had started mounting missile launchers on highway overpasses. It’s a direct militarization of a civilian utility.

Keep in mind that the U.S. Government — under all administrations — has shown that it will abuse every technical advantage it can, as long as it can do so in secret. Perhaps you’ve forgotten James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, who falsely testified to Congress that the government does “not wittingly” collect the telephone records of millions of Americans. And he was just the tip of the iceberg. Before Clapper under Obama there was the Bush administration’s Stellar Wind" warrantless surveillance program. The list of government abuse of civilian resources is colossal .

Fighting against that isn’t political. It’s patriotic.

-mel

On Apr 25, 2021, at 12:02 AM, Mark Foster <blakjak at blakjak.net<mailto:blakjak at blakjak.net>> wrote:

On 25/04/2021 3:24 am, Mel Beckman wrote:
This doesn’t sound good, no matter how you slice it. The lack of transparency with a civilian resource is troubling at a minimum. I’m going to bogon this space as a defensive measure, until its real — and detailed — purpose can be known. The secret places of our government have proven themselves untrustworthy in the protection of citizens’ data and networks. They tend to think they know “what’s good for” us.

-mel

Why does anyone on the Internet need to publish to your arbitrary standards, what they intend to do with their IP address ranges?

Failure to advertise the IP address space to the Internet (until now, perhaps) doesn't make the address space any less legitimate, and though I'd expect the DoD to generally comply with all of the expected norms around BGP arrangements and published whois details, at the end of the day, they can nominate who should originate it from their AS and as long as we can see who owns it.... it's just not our business.

Any organisation who's used DoD space in a way that's likely to conflict with, well, the DoD, gambled and lost.

Mark.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210425/225643f8/attachment.html>