mark.tinka at seacom.com
Wed Sep 16 08:32:03 UTC 2020
On 15/Sep/20 19:00, aaron1 at gvtc.com wrote:
> Sorry guys, I'm not aware of much of what you mention as far as agenda, vendor motive, and hardware support, etc....
I'm not shy... this would be Cisco.
And somehow, they've managed to "convince" other vendors to go down this
rabbit hole, because it is seemingly clear that network operators
(especially mobile providers) may actually buy this cockamamie.
More information about the NANOG