kgerry at outlook.com
Tue Nov 10 16:05:36 UTC 2020
I am running on a huge assumption here, but I think Phoenix-IX runs on donated infrastructure. From what I recall, there was only an NRC to join Phoenix-IX.
And in regards to Walt's suggestion, it looks like HE already started one with Stellar Technologies. https://48ix.net <https://48ix.net/> but it is only in a single facility. So until that IX grows, both in peers and footprint, I'm stuck on Phoenix-IX.
I have wondered what happens if a participant storms the IX. Will somebody appear? Because attempts to reach their NOC/peering handles has resulted in a lack of response.
I also wonder how the other Ninja-IX exchanges are running, I haven't heard anything about them, is there the same lack of communication? Or do those have a local staff?
> On Nov 10, 2020, at 06:15, Matt Hoppes <mattlists at rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> How is the IX still running? Surely someone must be paying colo rent?
> On 11/10/20 9:03 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>> Always a good time for network operators to consider the risks of having any one person as a single point of failure for something kind of important:
>> Disaster recovery and continuity of business plans should always include the concept of what if some percentage of the key team members were to be suddenly unavailable permanently (the Malaysian airline incident, for example).
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 8:08 PM Kate Gerry <kgerry at outlook.com <mailto:kgerry at outlook.com>> wrote:
>> Is there anybody else even there? I thought that it was all Paul's show!
>> If I was able to (as in, had access to), I would offer to help/run
>> with the IX. I may live in California, but it's a realistic car trip
>> back and forth to Phoenix.
>>> On Nov 9, 2020, at 17:58, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net
>>> <mailto:nanog at ics-il.net>> wrote:
>>> Paul's LinkedIn seems to show that he checked out in April. Let me
>>> know if you have any success reaching anyone there.
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> *From:*"Kate Gerry" <kgerry at outlook.com <mailto:kgerry at outlook.com>>
>>> *To:*"Bill Woodcock" <woody at pch.net <mailto:woody at pch.net>>
>>> *Cc:*nanog at nanog.org <mailto:nanog at nanog.org>
>>> *Sent:*Monday, November 9, 2020 5:44:42 PM
>>> *Subject:*Re: Phoenix-IX Contact
>>> Just a heads-up, I never heard a word from anybody at Phoenix-IX.
>>> Is there anybody still running the IX? Or is it just on autopilot?
>>> It'd be nice if anybody had some information on whatever happened
>>> to Paul. Hopefully he is okay!
>>> On Sep 14, 2020, at 13:33, Kate Gerry <kgerry at outlook.com
>>> <mailto:kgerry at outlook.com>> wrote:
>>> Thank Bill! I've been trying to reach Paul for ages now,
>>> hopefully he pops back up again. We want to upgrade.
>>> On an unrelated note, it looks like somebody has their ticket
>>> system subscribed to the list... Awesome.
>>> *From: *Dating Support <dating.support at csvwebsupport.com
>>> <mailto:dating.support at csvwebsupport.com>>
>>> *Subject: **[#WQV-291-95071]: Phoenix-IX Contact*
>>> *Date: *September 14, 2020 at 12:43:20 PDT
>>> *To: *kgerry at outlook.com <mailto:kgerry at outlook.com>
>>> *Reply-To: *dating.support at csvwebsupport.com
>>> <mailto:dating.support at csvwebsupport.com>
>>> Kate Gerry,
>>> Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response
>>> confirming the receipt of your ticket. Our team will get
>>> back to you within 24 hours.
>>> On Sep 14, 2020, at 12:48, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net
>>> <mailto:woody at pch.net>> wrote:
>>> On Sep 14, 2020, at 9:31 PM, Kate Gerry
>>> <kgerry at outlook.com <mailto:kgerry at outlook.com>> wrote:
>>> Does anybody have a contact who works at Phoenix-IX? I
>>> have been attempting to reach somebody there for a
>>> while now without any luck.
>>> Attempts to each out topeering at phoenix-ix.net
>>> <mailto:peering at phoenix-ix.net>as well as Ninja-IX
>>> have been without any luck. We also tried reaching out
>>> to Paul Emmons via LinkedIn mail and never received a
>>> Paul is the correct person.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
More information about the NANOG