BGP Peers Data modeling schema

David Bass davidbass570 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 5 19:44:32 UTC 2020


I second Jeff in using YANG.

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 1:37 PM Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf at gmail.com>
wrote:

> YANG is the right direction.
> OpenConfig BGP and policy models are supported by every vendor on the
> earth.
> We are finalizing IETF BGP and policy models
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model is about to be last-called
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model is pretty much ready
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
> On Nov 5, 2020, 4:57 AM -0800, Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>,
> wrote:
>
> I'm designing a tool for provisioning configurations for an ITP and his
> Peers.
> The idea is that based on that, all the configs to all the involved
> components configurations to be deployed based on that source of data. I'm
> Talking about Routers, BMP, SNMP tool(Ex.: Zabbix), etc...
>
> But, once again, I'm feeling that I'm reinventing the wheel.
> I'm pretty sure that someone else has already suffered from that.
>
> I search for a bit, and I didn't find anything...
> But with this gray area between developers and network operators, I'm not
> sure if I'm looking at the right place.
>
> I even tried to look at http://schema.org but didn't find anything
> related to networks and BGP there yet.
>
>
> So, anyone could point me in the right direction?
> --
> Douglas Fernando Fischer
> Engº de Controle e Automação
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20201105/fcd7f0f1/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list