Technology risk without safeguards
sskalkunte at gmail.com
Thu Nov 5 06:51:03 UTC 2020
> ...I agree with Suresh that at this time, there
> is no scientific evidence that links RF with
> any kind of bodily harm.
Please note that there is scientific evidence to link chronic exposure to
RF result in chromosome instability*1, however there is no diagnostic test
to attribute a disease as the end state.
> My point is that we should not dismiss the
> physician who thought that he may have
> found something, as some kind of
Thank you. I am your everyday engineer who has had to cope with
after-effects of powerful EMF and hence self-taught biology. If not for
medical experts (cancer biology in academia) express confidence in my
analysis connecting post-exposure to RF biology to likely disease outcome,
I know better than to make a fool of myself. As I have said before, this
group has the clue to dig for truth and not be satisfied with pseudo
On Thursday, November 5, 2020, Sabri Berisha <sabri at cluecentral.net> wrote:
> ----- On Nov 4, 2020, at 7:19 PM, Randy Bush randy at psg.com wrote:
> >> The fact that we haven't been able to identify a factual relationship,
> >> does not mean that there isn't any.
> > just wow
> > and, for all we know, the back side of the moon is green cheese
> I don't think you got the message buried within my message. True science
> is open to change, based on learning new facts. Like I said initially, I
> agree with Suresh that at this time, there is no scientific evidence that
> links RF with any kind of bodily harm.
> The parts that Tom cited, are very much relevant, and only reinforce the
> notion that at this time, we simply do not know enough. We do know, that
> at the low doses we generally receive, there is no evidence for harmful
> My point is that we should not dismiss the physician who thought that he
> may have found something, as some kind of conspiracist. That's not how
> scientific progress is achieved.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NANOG