alternative to voip gateways

Sun May 3 21:15:00 UTC 2020

Agreed I would do the Adtran Total Access 5000. What you want is the
"combo" cards. They combine a SIP FXS gateway and DSL port on one port, aka
a Combo port. This would be the way to go, as it doesn't require external
splitters to combine a DSL and Voice signal as you are talking about with
two separate modules.

If cost is a concern, look at Zhone. They have carrier class gear on the
cheap.

BTW, some of these chassis can support like 1000's of lines out of 1 box.
Could do the whole village on a single rack quite easily.

On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 10:09 AM Mel Beckman <mel at beckman.org> wrote:

> We’ve been implementing similar DSL systems at large campgrounds for
> years. There are a huge number of high-density DSLAM solutions out there,
> and DSL CPE cost practically nothing. As you say, $25K is plenty to pay for
> the hardware, and a rack is plenty of space. The most time consuming part
> is wiring the existing POTS lines into amphenol connectors to plug into the
> DSLAM, 25 pairs at a time.
>
> In addition to Calix\Occam, Adtran‘s TotalAccess solution is worth looking
> into for their carrier-class support.
>
>  -mel beckman
>
> On May 3, 2020, at 5:09 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:
>
> 
> If you were to outfit them with three chassis of Calix\Occam B6-252s,
> you'd be under $25k for the whole thing and get ADSL2+ speeds. You would
> need most of a rack to do it.
>
> Other platforms may or may not be more cost effective or a better
> solution. Just throwing the idea out there.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Nick Edwards" <nick.z.edwards at gmail.com>
> *To: *"Jeremy Austin" <jhaustin at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *nanog at nanog.org
> *Sent: *Sunday, May 3, 2020 12:21:17 AM
> *Subject: *Re: alternative to voip gateways
>
> The huts or cabins whatever you want to call them,  are right behind
> the admin building at entrance, so first is about 300 meters and the
> furtherest  is just under 1 mile
>
> Cost will be an issue, Im sure I will have no problems if I have to
> install a full rack of gateways and another full of dslams if it costs
> 150K, over something 1/5th the size in one rack that will cost 200k -
> since the company is not charging them for internet or voice.
>
> On 5/2/20, Jeremy Austin <jhaustin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > What’s the average loop length? Grandstream is probably OK to 5+ kfeet
> but
> > you will lose CID before that.
> >
> > As the low cost option don’t expect them to be trouble-free (or have
> > particularly good vendor support), but they might work in your
> application
> > if cheap is what makes sense.
> >
> > My $.02
> >
> > Jeremy Austin
> >
> > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 10:11 PM Andrey Slastenov <a.slastenov at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Look at MSAN solution. Like Huawei UA5000 or similar solutions from
> other
> >> vendors.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Andrey
> >>
> >> > 2 мая 2020 г., в 07:21, Nick Edwards <nick.z.edwards at gmail.com>
> >> написал(а):
> >> >
> >> > I'm looking at a new sister company we just took over, their remote
> >> > village has 1700 analogue phone lines to the workers huts, but they go
> >> > nowhere past the MDF.
> >> >
> >> > The office runs voip, now i'm told i have to get phones to the workers
> >> > because the <lots of explicit words> AKA previous owners of that
> >> > business  stopped the build when they ran into financial problems.
> >> >
> >> > So my plan is to utilize the existing many miles worth of copper
> pairs.
> >> >
> >> > I'm looking at throwing them into Versa Dslams that use pppoe pass
> >> > through, throw in a mikoTik 1036 as pppoe server, and we got spare
> >> > R710 i can use as radius server, and by my limited knowledge this
> >> > works.
> >> >
> >> > OK data done, but... now all those pots out lines need to go somewhere
> >> > that can handle 1700 or more lines, I am looking at either grandstream
> >> > 48 port FXS gateways or sangoma vega 50 ports (which Ill use as 48 so
> >> > theres a 1:1 match with dslams) the vega 3050 probably wont be used
> >> > because they are more than twice the price of grandstream.
> >> >
> >> > But this all results in a sh1te load of 48 port gateways (power is not
> >> > a concern), but wondering if there is another solution that is more
> >> > cost effective? Seems the regular NEC's Siemens and so on might have
> >> > an option but I can imagine it will be far more expensive than a bunch
> >> > of individual gateways.
> >> >
> >> > This project is in my mind workable, but i've not done such a thing on
> >> > a large scale.
> >> > Those who have experience in this field care to chime in? is my method
> >> > acceptable or not for such a project size?
> >> >
> >> > most pbx's I've done are only few hundred analogue lines where
> >> > gateways are more suited and definitely more cost effective, at all
> >> > our locations we use freepbx which works perfectly, and we know the
> >> > beefyness of the box we'll need to install to handle this load, thats
> >> > not a problem if we go down the gateway method.
> >> >
> >> > thoughts?
> >>
> > --
> > Jeremy Austin
> > jhaustin at gmail.com
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200503/143bd878/attachment.html>