UDP/123 policers & status

Ragnar Sundblad ragge at kth.se
Sat Mar 28 23:00:53 UTC 2020



> On 28 Mar 2020, at 23:29, Bottiger <bottiger10 at gmail.com> wrote:
...
> Broken protocols need to be removed and blacklisted at every edge.

A protocol isn’t broken just because it can be abused when spoofed,
it is abused. Even TCP can be abused in that way.
Should we blacklist and remove TCP?

> Pushing the responsibility to BCP38 is unrealistic.

It would help quite a bit against a lot if abuse, and it would be
reasonable to include it on a lowest level of technical level to
actually get to be called an ISP.

So what do the ISP:s want - earn money while doing nothing until the
Internet is unusable? I don’t get it.
There are enough threats against the open Internet as it is, we
don’t need that too.

Ragnar




More information about the NANOG mailing list