Google peering in LAX

Seth Mattinen sethm at rollernet.us
Tue Mar 3 01:37:16 UTC 2020


On 3/2/20 4:32 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> That said, I fear this is going to be a problem long term. A blind “no /24s” filter is dangerous, plus it might solve all traffic issues. It is going to take effort to be sure you don’t get bitten by the Law Of Unintended Consequences.


As soon as Google un-freezes new peering requests so I can get a direct 
peering that includes appropriate /24's I've been told offlist I should 
get (instead of the route server subset) I'll happily remove the transit 
filters. But I can only work with what I'm given.



More information about the NANOG mailing list