Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun Jun 21 11:28:19 UTC 2020


On 21/Jun/20 12:45, Baldur Norddahl wrote:

>
> Yes I once made a plan to have one VRF per transit provider plus a
> peering VRF. That way our BGP customers could have a session with each
> of those VRFs to allow them full control of the route mix. I would of
> course also need a Internet VRF for our own needs.
>
> But the reality of that would be too many copies of the DFZ in the
> routing tables. Although not necessary in the FIB as each of the
> transit VRFs could just have a default route installed.

We just opted for BGP communities :-).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200621/c2242998/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list