[c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Thu Jun 11 08:00:52 UTC 2020


On 11/Jun/20 09:42, Saku Ytti wrote:

>
> I don't like to conflate these two; SR is great, SRv6 is horrible
> abomination. SR is what MPLS should have been day1, but it probably
> was easier to market LDP than to say 'we need to change all IGP
> protocols'.

Fair point.

Mark.



More information about the NANOG mailing list