Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

• Previous message (by thread): Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation
• Next message (by thread): Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Yo Rachee!

On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:59:17 -0700
Rachee Singh <rachee.singh at gmail.com> wrote:

> PS: as someone correctly pointed out, the more appropriate
> terminology is "IP blocklists".

Google says that descriminates against the Eastern Block of the EU.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 851 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200616/548549bf/attachment.sig>

• Previous message (by thread): Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation
• Next message (by thread): Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]