[c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check

• Previous message (by thread): [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check
• Next message (by thread): [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 11/Jun/20 09:42, Saku Ytti wrote:

>
> I don't like to conflate these two; SR is great, SRv6 is horrible
> abomination. SR is what MPLS should have been day1, but it probably
> was easier to market LDP than to say 'we need to change all IGP
> protocols'.

Fair point.

Mark.

• Previous message (by thread): [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check
• Next message (by thread): [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]