LDPv6 Census Check

• Previous message (by thread): LDPv6 Census Check
• Next message (by thread): [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 10/Jun/20 21:36, Phil Bedard wrote:
> In its simplest form without TE paths, there isn't much to SRv6.  You use a v6 address as an endpoint and a portion of the address to specify a specific VPN service.  You completely eliminate the label distribution protocol. 

A BGPv6-free core is a decent use-case for us.

Much simplicity has been enjoyed by removing that in the IPv4 world.

Mark.

• Previous message (by thread): LDPv6 Census Check
• Next message (by thread): [c-nsp] LDPv6 Census Check
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]