MAP-T in production

Ca By cb.list6 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 22 21:52:52 UTC 2020


On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:18 PM Brian Johnson <brian.johnson at netgeek.us>
wrote:

> Has anyone implemented a MAP-T solution in production? I am looking for
> feedback on this as a deployment strategy for an IPv6 only core design. My
> concern is MAP-T CE stability and overhead on the network. The BR will have
> to do overloaded NAT anyway to access IPv4 only resources. The idea being
> that when IPv4 is no longer needed, this will be a quicker “clean-up”
> project than a dual-stack solution.
>
> I have reviewed Jordan Gotlieb’s presentation from Charter and would love
> to hear if this is still in use at Charter or if was ever fully implemented
> and the experiences)
>

Does not loo like Charter moved the needle in the last few years

https://www.worldipv6launch.org/apps/ipv6week/measurement/images/graphs/CharterCommunications.png



> I’d love any real life examples and success/failure stories.
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200722/1355d226/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list