BFD for long haul circuit

Sat Jul 18 16:10:36 UTC 2020

On 18/Jul/20 15:31, adamv0025 at netconsultings.com wrote:
>
> Well luckily we have MEF to set expectations about ones
> EPL/EVPL/EPLAN/EVPLAN performance. (and formal SLA contracts
> describing every single aspect of the service and its performance).
>
> Anyways, when I was designing these the back in the days when it was
> cool and demand was high, customers (other carriers) were getting
> MTU9100 (to fit customers MTU9000), the whole CFM & LFM shebang (to
> the point made earlier in the thread that the link should go down on
> both ends -like it’s the case with a wave) and sub 50ms convergence in
> case something when wrong inside our backbone.
>
>  
>
> We as a provider got more $$$ from single investment to our
> wave/fiber, but our customers could enjoy p2p links on par with wave
> for less $.
>

It's probably worth noting that easily 90% of all remote peering
circuits are running over an EoMPLS service, FWIW.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200718/3ccf4166/attachment.html>