questions asked during network engineer interview
Michael Thomas
mike at mtcc.com
Tue Jul 14 20:27:15 UTC 2020
On 7/14/20 1:14 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020, 11:00 Ahmed elBorno <amaged at gmail.com
> <mailto:amaged at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> 15 years ago, I applied to a network admin role at Google, it was
> for their corporate office, not even the production network.
>
> I had less than two years experience.
>
> The interviewer asked me:
> [...]
> 2) If we had a 1GB file that we need to transfer between America
> and Europe, how much time do we need, knowing that we start with a
> TCP size of X?
>
>
>
> I *love* questions like that, because I can immediately respond back
> with "well, that depends; did your sysadmin configure rfc1323
> extension support in your TCP stack? Is SACK enabled? What about
> window scaling? Does your OS do dynamic buffer tuning for TCP, or are
> the values locked in at start time?"
>
> Depending on how the interviewer responds gives me a pretty good idea
> how much clue the people I'd be working with have, and how well they
> work collaboratively even with people they don't really know. If they
> respond well on their feet, and give me better inputs, I respond with
> a better answer.
>
> If they say "It doesn't matter", then I respond by saying "See, that's
> why things aren't working so well for you here; you don't really
> understand how far down the rabbit hole goes", and respectfully ask to
> end the interview before we waste any more of each other's time.
>
This is the generic problem with interviewing is that people seem to
believe they are born with a god given innate ability to interview
people. They ask a generic question, and are surprised and often
offended that they get an "it depends" and "please clarify XYZ".
Interviewing is *hard* and doing a semblance of a good interview for a
candidate is time consuming, so most people just punt with stupid
unthoughtful questions where they think that all of the requirements are
perfectly clear. Your answer *should* impress them, but I doubt that's
the case in general.
Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200714/c60f4457/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list