Reminiscing our first internet connections (WAS) Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

Bryan Holloway bryan at shout.net
Mon Jan 27 12:51:42 UTC 2020



On 1/27/20 1:42 PM, Aled Morris via NANOG wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 12:13, Rob Pickering <rob at pickering.org 
> <mailto:rob at pickering.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Wasn't the 56/64k thing a result of CAS (bit robbed) signalling
>     which was a fudge AT&T did to transport signalling information
>     in-band on T1s by stealing the low order bit for OOB signalling (it
>     wasnt actually every low order bit, but meant you had to throw away
>     every low order bit as CPE didn't know which ones were "corrupted"
>     by the carrier).
>     Proper ISDN was always 64kbit/s clear path with separate D channels
>     carried OOB end to end, away from the B channel data.
> 
> 
> There was some element of interoperability required with the 
> pre-existing data network architecture based on 56k channels and T1 
> bearers.  This article has the detail:
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-carrier
> 
>     /Soon after commercial success of T1 in 1962, the T1 engineering
>     team realized the mistake of having only one bit to serve the
>     increasing demand for housekeeping functions. They petitioned AT&T
>     management to change to 8-bit framing. This was flatly turned down
>     because it would make installed systems obsolete./
> 
> 
> Compared to what was to follow, that all had to suffer the 56k channel 
> limitation, there can't have been that many installed systems in 1962!
> 
> Aled


I seem to also recall that you couldn't use a 56k modem unless the 
far-end was digital.



More information about the NANOG mailing list