akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

Aaron Gould aaron1 at gvtc.com
Fri Jan 24 14:46:28 UTC 2020


Interesting… I just found this.  Speaks of 800 gbps, 1.2 tbps, 1.6 tbps Ethernet

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terabit_Ethernet

 

https://ethernetalliance.org/technology/2019-roadmap/

 

https://ethernetalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/EthernetRoadmap-2019-Side1-ToPrint.pdf

 

https://ethernetalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/EthernetRoadmap-2019-Side2-ToPrint.pdf

 

-Aaron

 

From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of jdambrosia at gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 11:42 AM
To: 'Tom Beecher'; 'Jared Mauch'
Cc: 'NANOG list'
Subject: RE: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

 

Love it Love it Love it

 

I have been telling people that the IEEE 802.3 Ethernet Working Group needs to start looking beyond 400 Gb/s Ethernet.  It’s only a matter of time where we will need it!

 

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> On Behalf Of Tom Beecher
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 6:39 PM
To: Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net>
Cc: NANOG list <Nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

 

I think this is a tribute to how we’ve built and upgraded networks for capacity and speed.

 

I think it's spot on. 

 

In years past it made more sense to distribute smaller , incremental patches. More work on the software side, but it was likely a better option than getting blasted on Twitter because "OMG I WANT TO PLAY AND MY DOWNLOAD IS TAKING 8 HOURS". 

 

This just follows the same rules as networks have always seemed to; If you build it, they will come, and you'll have to build more. :) 

 

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:57 AM Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:



> On Jan 23, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:13:15 +0100, Bryan Holloway said:
> 
>> Game releases are hardly a new thing, but these last two events seem to
>> be almost an order of magnitude higher than what we're used to (at least
>> on our predominantly eyeball network.)
>> 
>> Any thoughts from the community? We're taking steps to accommodate, but
>> from a capacity-planning perspective, this seems non-linear to me.
> 
> Be prepared for an entire new world of hurt this holiday season. Sony has already
> confirmed that PS5 releases will ship on 100Gbyte blu-ray disks.  Which means that
> download sizes will be comparable…

There’s also the “we will stream you all the data things” I keep hearing about like the
Consoles without discs or some other thing I can’t remember the name of.

I think this is a tribute to how we’ve built and upgraded networks for capacity and speed.

- Jared

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200124/219a1266/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list