[External] Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential

Ca By cb.list6 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 21 21:26:09 UTC 2020


On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:22 PM Hunter Fuller <hf0002+nanog at uah.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:42 PM Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:
> > I can already hear the QUIC WG types blaming the network in abstentia,
> because well, why would an operator want to keep their network functioning?
> :-)
>
> In fairness, it's not actually functioning. For one thing, it's
> passing some traffic at an abysmal rate. ;)
>

Life and engineering are full of trade-offs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200221/a840a21c/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list