QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential

Fred Baker fredbaker.ietf at gmail.com
Wed Feb 19 19:54:28 UTC 2020



> On Feb 18, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I am not a fan of quic or any udp traffic. My suggestion was that Google use an new L4 instead of UDP, but that was too hard for the Googlers.

The argument I have heard is that residential firewalls often block anything that is *not* UDP or TCP. The question for the googlers was existential - can it work at all?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200219/c35e8c2e/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list