Tell me about AS19111

Fri Feb 7 00:30:45 UTC 2020

In message <24124.30737.599536.809689 at gargle.gargle.HOWL>, 
Sandra Murphy <sandy at tislabs.com> wrote:

>It could measure the extent of the problem and would be within what I
>suggested.
>
>For example if there were only one AS being abused that would make it
>a different priority than 1,000 or 10,000 (some seem to be implying a
>number like that) being abused.
>
>Do we have that number?

I suggested that nobody has that number, to any degree of accuracy,
as of today.

Once again, this is something that I would be happy to be proven
wrong about.

Regards,
rfg