Does anyone actually like CenturyLink?

Bill Woodcock woody at pch.net
Mon Aug 31 08:09:47 UTC 2020



>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020, 6:02 PM Ross Tajvar <ross at tajvar.io> wrote:
>> Other than lack of options, why would anyone use them?
>> 
> On Aug 30, 2020, at 6:41 PM, Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com> wrote:
> Connectivity and latency (of Level3 which was acquired).

Yeah.  What I think a lot of us liked was Global Crossing.  When Global Crossing was sucked into L3, L3 managed to retain a fair bit of what was good about Global Crossing.  The L3 got sucked into CenturyLink, and CenturyLink managed to retain a fair bit of what was good about L3.  But.  There’s still some inefficiency there.  Aggregation isn’t the cleanest way to build a network.

                                -Bill

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200831/4712758e/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list