Bottlenecks and link upgrades
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Thu Aug 13 11:00:56 UTC 2020
Mark Tinka wrote on 13/08/2020 11:31:
> It's great to monitor packet loss, latency, pps, e.t.c. But packet loss
> at 10% link utilization is not a foreign occurrence. No amount of
> bandwidth upgrades will fix that.
you could easily have 10% utilization and see packet loss due to
insufficient bandwidth if you have egress << ingress and proportionally
low buffering, e.g. UDP or iSCSI from a 40G/100 port with egress to a
low-buffer 1G port.
This sort of thing is less likely in the imix world, but it can easily
happen with high capacity CDN nodes injecting content where the
receiving port is small and subject to bursty traffic.
Nick
More information about the NANOG
mailing list