CGNAT Solutions
Robert Blayzor
rblayzor.bulk at inoc.net
Wed Apr 29 14:41:37 UTC 2020
On 4/29/20 10:29 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> There are some numbers in there for instance talking about 1024 ports
> per subscriber as a good number. In presentations I have seen over time,
> people typically talk about 512-4096 as being a good number for the bulk
> port allocation size.
So as a happy medium of about 2048 ports per subscriber, that's roughly
a 32:1 NAT/IP over-subscription ?
--
inoc.net!rblayzor
XMPP: rblayzor.AT.inoc.net
PGP: https://pgp.inoc.net/rblayzor/
More information about the NANOG
mailing list