CGNAT Solutions
Mike Hammett
nanog at ics-il.net
Wed Apr 29 14:39:08 UTC 2020
I haven't used them, but 6-WIND is pretty proud of their CGNAT performance.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Alcock" <john at alcock.org>
To: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 2:12:29 PM
Subject: CGNAT Solutions
Afternoon,
I run a small ISP in Tennessee. COVID has forced a lot of people to work from home. I am starting to run low on IP's and need to consider CGNAT.
I do have IPV6 space, but we all know that until we force everyone to move to IPV6, we need to keep IPV4 up and running.
I could buy more space, but I am really wondering if that is the best option. It is expensive. I know CGNAT devices are expensive as well, but it looks like I could stretch it out a bit.
My thinking is to convert about 50% of my subscribers to CGNAT.
I am interested in vendors or devices you have used in the past. I already know about the pitfalls many of my subscribers will have with CGNAT such as VPN's, Gamers, etc.
What are your thoughts on CGNAT vendors?
A10Networks
F5Networks
Others?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200429/529c1c52/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list